emergencyBreaking NewsBitcoin's $76,000 Threshold Sets Stage for Potential $125,000 Short SqueezeRobinhood Gains Leverage as SEC Scraps $25,000 Day Trading MinimumGas Prices at $4.10 a Gallon: The Iran War’s Energy Shock Is Already Pressing on ConsumersMore than 118,000 set to gain from Japan-funded health projects in NamibiaMortgage Search Volumes Hit 2.15 Million in March as Borrowers React to Economic UncertaintyBitcoin's $76,000 Threshold Sets Stage for Potential $125,000 Short SqueezeRobinhood Gains Leverage as SEC Scraps $25,000 Day Trading MinimumGas Prices at $4.10 a Gallon: The Iran War’s Energy Shock Is Already Pressing on ConsumersMore than 118,000 set to gain from Japan-funded health projects in NamibiaMortgage Search Volumes Hit 2.15 Million in March as Borrowers React to Economic Uncertainty
DoiDoi
Credit & Lendingexpand_more
Credit CardsPersonal LoansStudent Loans
Markets & Investingexpand_more
Stocks & ETFsCrypto & BlockchainFed & Macro
Retirement & Benefitsexpand_more
401(k) & IRASocial SecurityRetirement Policy
Real Estateexpand_more
Mortgage RatesHousing Market
Financial Foundationexpand_more
Budgeting & SavingInsurance
Latest News
MarketsPortfolio
The Digital Ledger
Credit & Lending
Markets & Investing
Retirement & Benefits
Real Estate
Financial Foundation
Latest News
Dashboards

Institutional Financial Analysis

Home/Briefs/trading losses
BriefApril 17, 2026 · 05:41 AM

Goldman Sachs’ big rate bets backfire as war-driven inflation fears lift interest rates

Goldman Sachs’ fixed income, currencies and commodities division recorded a 10% drop in first-quarter revenues after its bets on falling interest rates collapsed when the Iran war reshaped inflation and growth expectations. The bank had positioned its rates trading desk to profit from a weakening U.S. economy and lower borrowing costs, aligning with expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts. But the outbreak of war in late February triggered a sudden market reassessment: instead of slowing growth leading to easier monetary policy, investors began pricing in the risk of stagflation—slower growth alongside rising inflation—prompted by geopolitical disruption. That scenario increased the likelihood that the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England and the European Central Bank would hold or even raise interest rates. The reversal hit Goldman’s positions directly, as market prices moved sharply against its trades. While rivals including JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley posted strong double-digit gains in similar trading divisions, Goldman’s rates desk became the primary source of weakness. Volatility also amplified losses during client-driven trading surges, as the bank facilitated large-scale position unwinds. Still, the firm reported its highest quarterly profit in five years, powered by a record $5.3 billion in equities trading revenue—a reminder that the same turmoil that eroded one division’s returns turbocharged another.

Charlie Wilde
trading lossesinterest rate riskgeopolitical risk

More Briefs

Apr 17

Robinhood Gains Leverage as SEC Scraps $25,000 Day Trading Minimum

Apr 17

Gas Prices at $4.10 a Gallon: The Iran War’s Energy Shock Is Already Pressing on Consumers

Apr 17

More than 118,000 set to gain from Japan-funded health projects in Namibia

Apr 17

Mortgage Search Volumes Hit 2.15 Million in March as Borrowers React to Economic Uncertainty

View All Briefs →
DoiDoi

© 2026 DojiDoji. All rights reserved.

EditorialEditorial GuidelinesCorrections
LegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service
DisclosureSEC DisclosuresAd Choice
SocialX (Twitter)LinkedIn