emergencyBreaking NewsBitcoin Flirts With $76K as Traders Bet Against the RallyFederal Deficits Drive Higher Borrowing Costs for ConsumersUpstart's AI Model Mismanagement Led to Revenue Shortfalls and a 9.7% Stock DropOppenheimer targets $265 Nvidia share price on AI platform expansionA $5,181 Monthly Social Security Benefit vs. $1,200: How Claiming Age and Earnings Create the GapBitcoin Flirts With $76K as Traders Bet Against the RallyFederal Deficits Drive Higher Borrowing Costs for ConsumersUpstart's AI Model Mismanagement Led to Revenue Shortfalls and a 9.7% Stock DropOppenheimer targets $265 Nvidia share price on AI platform expansionA $5,181 Monthly Social Security Benefit vs. $1,200: How Claiming Age and Earnings Create the Gap
DoiDoi
Credit & Lendingexpand_more
Credit CardsPersonal LoansStudent Loans
Markets & Investingexpand_more
Stocks & ETFsCrypto & BlockchainFed & Macro
Retirement & Benefitsexpand_more
401(k) & IRASocial SecurityRetirement Policy
Real Estateexpand_more
Mortgage RatesHousing Market
Financial Foundationexpand_more
Budgeting & SavingInsurance
Latest News
MarketsPortfolio
The Digital Ledger
Credit & Lending
Markets & Investing
Retirement & Benefits
Real Estate
Financial Foundation
Latest News
Dashboards

Institutional Financial Analysis

Home/Financial Foundation/LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE

A $7,242-a-year personal cost that consumes 26% of income is now the hidden tax on caregiving

LA

Leona Aldridge

long-term care insurance · Apr 18, 2026

A $7,242-a-year personal cost that consumes 26% of income is now the hidden tax on caregiving

Source: DojiDoji Data Terminal

Caregivers are spending an average of $7,242 per year out of pocket — the equivalent of 26% of their income — to care for a loved one. This is not incidental spending. It is a structural transfer of wealth from family balance sheets into the gaps of America’s long-term care system. And it is happening at scale.

Related Brief1d ago
retirement planning

The long-term care cost gap: why $165,000 isn’t the same for men and women

A 65-year-old woman should expect to pay $73,000 more out of pocket for long-term care than a man the same age. The Center for Retirement Research at Boston College estimates the average woman will face $171,000 in costs, compared to $98,000 for men. The gap stems not from pricing differences but from longevity: women live longer, are more likely to outlive their spouses, and therefore face longer periods without access to free, family-provided care. About half of all long-term care hours are unpaid—delivered by relatives. Men are more likely to have a spouse available to provide that support. Nearly half of men will need no paid care at all. A quarter will use less than a year. Just 29% will require more than a year. Women are far more exposed: 41% will need over a year of paid services, and 14% will require five years or more. The national average of $165,000 is a starting point. It should be increased for those in high-cost regions—especially cities in the Northeast and West Coast—where care prices rise and life expectancy extends, compounding duration and cost. Personal health and family history, particularly of dementia or chronic illness, also raise projected needs. In-home care, assisted living, and nursing homes carry different price tags, and the choice often depends on severity and duration. Savings are the primary funding source. Long-term care insurance offers protection, but the market has contracted. The Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program, once a major option for federal employees and retirees, has not accepted new applicants for three years. It is undergoing a financial review after a decade of premium increases eroded its stability.

Sixty-three million Americans — nearly one in four adults — provided ongoing care for an adult or child with a complex medical condition or disability in the past year. Nearly one in four of them spent more than 40 hours a week on caregiving, and one-third have been doing it for five years or more. The work is not temporary. It is not episodic. For millions, it is a second, unpaid job with no end date.

Related Brief2d ago
retirement planning

Retirees Should Budget $200,000 for Healthcare — Even With Medicare

Retirees should set aside $200,000 for medical costs in their later years — a figure that underscores how Medicare alone won’t cover the full burden of healthcare in retirement. Even after becoming eligible for Medicare, retirees face significant out-of-pocket expenses, making healthcare one of the largest line items in a retirement budget. Whitney Stidom, vice president of consumer enablement at eHealth, emphasized that retirees must plan for this reality. Medicare coverage varies widely, and choices around prescription drugs, access to preferred doctors, and management of chronic conditions can dramatically affect annual costs. Evaluating these factors carefully doesn’t just ensure continuity of care — it can yield more than $1,800 in savings each year.

The financial toll begins with direct expenses. The average caregiver spends $7,242 annually, according to AARP. For those caring for someone with Alzheimer’s or dementia, that figure climbs close to $9,000. Among working caregivers who report two or more work-related strains — such as cutting back hours or leaving the workforce — the average jumps to $10,525 per year.

Related Brief7h ago
caregiving

Leaving the workforce to care for a loved one can cost $295,000 in lifetime income

At 72, Susan Freeman works four days a week at her sister’s store with little savings to fund her retirement. She left her job to care for her mother after a stroke, sold her pizzeria, and lived on disability and her husband’s income. Her mother moved to a nursing home in 2015 and passed away in 2019. Freeman says she does not regret caring for her mother, but admits the financial toll was severe. Edward Jones research shows 25% of caregivers left their jobs, and 95% are worried about retirement security. The Urban Institute estimates unpaid caregivers forgo an average of $295,000 in lifetime income. Lost earnings translate to smaller Social Security benefits and weaker retirement security.

The damage compounds over time. Nearly half of caregivers experience at least one major financial consequence: stopping retirement savings, taking on debt, or being unable to afford basic needs. Caregivers who begin early in life face up to a 90% deficit in retirement savings by age 65 compared to non-caregivers, potentially requiring an extra 21 years of work to catch up. Women bear a disproportionate burden, losing a median of $24,500 in wages over two years when providing intensive care for their mothers.

Related Brief22h ago
retirement planning

Median US retirement savings hit $955

The median amount US workers have saved for retirement is $955. This figure, which includes those with no savings, comes from a report by the National Institute on Retirement Security. For workers who have savings, the median balance is $40,000. Among those nearing retirement, aged 55 to 64, the median is $30,000. The American Enterprise Institute projects the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund will run short of funds by 2032, at which point Social Security benefits could be cut by 24%. Savings levels vary by income bracket. According to the Transamerica Institute, the median retirement savings for households earning under $50,000 is $2,000. For those earning $50,000 to $99,000, the median is $33,000. For households earning $100,000 to $199,000, the median is $147,000. For those earning $200,000 and above, the median is $565,000.

This cost exists because the system is designed to offload responsibility. Medicare does not cover long-term custodial care. Medicaid steps in only after assets are depleted. The $1.01 trillion in unpaid labor provided by caregivers exceeds total federal and state Medicaid spending in 2024. The value is captured. The cost is not shared.

Related Brief2d ago
retirement planning

Eighty percent of older households lack the funds for long-term care

Roughly 80% of households with adults age 60 and older lack the resources to cover long-term care costs or weather a financial emergency. This deficiency exists as the oldest baby boomers turn 80 in 2026 and the population of those 65 and older is projected to rise from 61 million in 2024 to more than 80 million by 2040. The mismatch between total years lived and lifespan is 12.4 years. Women can expect to live roughly 14 years in poor health and men 11 years. The vast majority of this population will require ongoing care or support, yet few plan for it, often mistakenly believing Medicare will cover long-term care costs.

long-term care insurance

The Ledger Morning

The essential intelligence to start your trading day. Delivered 6:00 AM EST.

Join 50,000+ professionals who start their day with The Digital Ledger.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read More Analysis

ETF inflows data

Bitcoin Flirts With $76K as Traders Bet Against the Rally

Bitcoin is trading at $75,580, up 1.2% in the past 24 hours and nearing an intraday high of $76,114—yet traders aren’t c…

Vanguard

VOOG’s 21% Upside Outpaces VOO and VOOV, but at a Higher Volatility Cost

VOOG is projected to deliver a 21% return by 2026, outpacing both VOO and VOOV, which carry 17% and 13% upside, respecti…

DoiDoi

© 2026 DojiDoji. All rights reserved.

EditorialEditorial GuidelinesCorrections
LegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service
DisclosureSEC DisclosuresAd Choice
SocialX (Twitter)LinkedIn